🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.